Split-kl and PAC-Bayes-split-kl Inequalities for Ternary Random Variables
원문 초록
We present a new concentration of measure inequality for sums of independent bounded random variables, which we name a split-kl inequality. The inequality is particularly well-suited for ternary random variables, which naturally show up in a variety of problems, including analysis of excess losses in classification, analysis of weighted majority votes, and learning with abstention. We demonstrate that for ternary random variables the inequality is simultaneously competitive with the kl inequality, the Empirical Bernstein inequality, and the Unexpected Bernstein inequality, and in certain regimes outperforms all of them. It resolves an open question by Tolstikhin and Seldin [2013] and Mhammedi et al. [2019] on how to match simultaneously the combinatorial power of the kl inequality when the distribution happens to be close to binary and the power of Bernstein inequalities to exploit low variance when the probability mass is concentrated on the middle value. We also derive a PAC-Bayes-split-kl inequality and compare it with the PAC-Bayes-kl, PAC-Bayes-Empirical-Bennett, and PAC-Bayes-Unexpected-Bernstein inequalities in an analysis of excess losses and in an analysis of a weighted majority vote for several UCI datasets. Last but not least, our study provides the first direct comparison of the Empirical Bernstein and Unexpected Bernstein inequalities and their PAC-Bayes extensions.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
CulFiT: A Fine-grained Cultural-aware LLM Training Paradigm via Multilingual Critique Data Synthesis
O$^2$-Searcher: A Searching-based Agent Model for Open-Domain Open-Ended Question Answering
Ranked Voting based Self-Consistency of Large Language Models
Neptune: The Long Orbit to Benchmarking Long Video Understanding
Utilize the Flow before Stepping into the Same River Twice: Certainty Represented Knowledge Flow for Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning
Ranking Generated Answers: On the Agreement of Retrieval Models with Humans on Consumer Health Questions
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.