Don't Explain Noise: Robust Counterfactuals for Randomized Ensembles
원문 초록
Counterfactual explanations describe how to modify a feature vector in order to flip the outcome of a trained classifier. Obtaining robust counterfactual explanations is essential to provide valid algorithmic recourse and meaningful explanations. We study the robustness of explanations of randomized ensembles, which are always subject to algorithmic uncertainty even when the training data is fixed. We formalize the generation of robust counterfactual explanations as a probabilistic problem and show the link between the robustness of ensemble models and the robustness of base learners. We develop a practical method with good empirical performance and support it with theoretical guarantees for ensembles of convex base learners. Our results show that existing methods give surprisingly low robustness: the validity of naive counterfactuals is below $50\%$ on most data sets and can fall to $20\%$ on problems with many features. In contrast, our method achieves high robustness with only a small increase in the distance from counterfactual explanations to their initial observations.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Graph Style Transfer for Counterfactual Explainability
Performative Validity of Recourse Explanations
Generalizability vs. Counterfactual Explainability Trade-Off
Real-time Program Evaluation using Anytime-valid Rank Tests
Learning Time Series Counterfactuals via Latent Space Representations
Llama See, Llama Do: A Mechanistic Perspective on Contextual Entrainment and Distraction in LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.