Detecting hidden confounding in observational data using multiple environments
원문 초록
A common assumption in causal inference from observational data is that there is no hidden confounding. Yet it is, in general, impossible to verify this assumption from a single dataset. Under the assumption of independent causal mechanisms underlying the data-generating process, we demonstrate a way to detect unobserved confounders when having multiple observational datasets coming from different environments. We present a theory for testable conditional independencies that are only absent when there is hidden confounding and examine cases where we violate its assumptions: degenerate & dependent mechanisms, and faithfulness violations. Additionally, we propose a procedure to test these independencies and study its empirical finite-sample behavior using simulation studies and semi-synthetic data based on a real-world dataset. In most cases, the proposed procedure correctly predicts the presence of hidden confounding, particularly when the confounding bias is large.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Learning Causally Predictable Outcomes from Psychiatric Longitudinal Data
Towards Robust Multimodal Emotion Recognition under Missing Modalities and Distribution Shifts
From Images to Insights: Explainable Biodiversity Monitoring with Plain Language Habitat Explanations
Paths to Causality: Finding Informative Subgraphs Within Knowledge Graphs for Knowledge-Based Causal Discovery
Causal Effect Identification in lvLiNGAM from Higher-Order Cumulants
N$^2$: A Unified Python Package and Test Bench for Nearest Neighbor-Based Matrix Completion
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.