Memorization in NLP Fine-tuning Methods
원문 초록
Large language models are shown to present privacy risks through memorization of training data, and several recent works have studied such risks for the pre-training phase. Little attention, however, has been given to the fine-tuning phase and it is not well understood how different fine-tuning methods (such as fine-tuning the full model, the model head, and adapter) compare in terms of memorization risk. This presents increasing concern as the "pre-train and fine-tune" paradigm proliferates. In this paper, we empirically study memorization of fine-tuning methods using membership inference and extraction attacks, and show that their susceptibility to attacks is very different. We observe that fine-tuning the head of the model has the highest susceptibility to attacks, whereas fine-tuning smaller adapters appears to be less vulnerable to known extraction attacks.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination
Dataset distillation for memorized data: Soft labels can leak held-out teacher knowledge
LexiMark: Robust Watermarking via Lexical Substitutions to Enhance Membership Verification of an LLM's Textual Training Data
Capacity Matters: a Proof-of-Concept for Transformer Memorization on Real-World Data
Diffusion models under low-noise regime
HeuriGym: An Agentic Benchmark for LLM-Crafted Heuristics in Combinatorial Optimization
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.