Making sense of violence risk predictions using clinical notes
원문 초록
Violence risk assessment in psychiatric institutions enables interventions to avoid violence incidents. Clinical notes written by practitioners and available in electronic health records (EHR) are valuable resources that are seldom used to their full potential. Previous studies have attempted to assess violence risk in psychiatric patients using such notes, with acceptable performance. However, they do not explain why classification works and how it can be improved. We explore two methods to better understand the quality of a classifier in the context of clinical note analysis: random forests using topic models, and choice of evaluation metric. These methods allow us to understand both our data and our methodology more profoundly, setting up the groundwork to work on improved models that build upon this understanding. This is particularly important when it comes to the generalizability of evaluated classifiers to new data, a trustworthiness problem that is of great interest due to the increased availability of new data in electronic format.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Narrative Shift Detection: A Hybrid Approach of Dynamic Topic Models and Large Language Models
Constrained Non-negative Matrix Factorization for Guided Topic Modeling of Minority Topics
Evaluating Negative Sampling Approaches for Neural Topic Models
Seeded Poisson Factorization: Leveraging domain knowledge to fit topic models
Refining Dimensions for Improving Clustering-based Cross-lingual Topic Models
Locating the Leading Edge of Cultural Change
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.