Testing the Ability of Language Models to Interpret Figurative Language
원문 초록
Figurative and metaphorical language are commonplace in discourse, and figurative expressions play an important role in communication and cognition. However, figurative language has been a relatively under-studied area in NLP, and it remains an open question to what extent modern language models can interpret nonliteral phrases. To address this question, we introduce Fig-QA, a Winograd-style nonliteral language understanding task consisting of correctly interpreting paired figurative phrases with divergent meanings. We evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art language models on this task, and find that although language models achieve performance significantly over chance, they still fall short of human performance, particularly in zero- or few-shot settings. This suggests that further work is needed to improve the nonliteral reasoning capabilities of language models.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
CulFiT: A Fine-grained Cultural-aware LLM Training Paradigm via Multilingual Critique Data Synthesis
O$^2$-Searcher: A Searching-based Agent Model for Open-Domain Open-Ended Question Answering
Ranked Voting based Self-Consistency of Large Language Models
Neptune: The Long Orbit to Benchmarking Long Video Understanding
Utilize the Flow before Stepping into the Same River Twice: Certainty Represented Knowledge Flow for Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning
Ranking Generated Answers: On the Agreement of Retrieval Models with Humans on Consumer Health Questions
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.