Spurious Correlations in Reference-Free Evaluation of Text Generation
원문 초록
Model-based, reference-free evaluation metrics have been proposed as a fast and cost-effective approach to evaluate Natural Language Generation (NLG) systems. Despite promising recent results, we find evidence that reference-free evaluation metrics of summarization and dialog generation may be relying on spurious correlations with measures such as word overlap, perplexity, and length. We further observe that for text summarization, these metrics have high error rates when ranking current state-of-the-art abstractive summarization systems. We demonstrate that these errors can be mitigated by explicitly designing evaluation metrics to avoid spurious features in reference-free evaluation.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Power-Law Decay Loss for Large Language Model Finetuning: Focusing on Information Sparsity to Enhance Generation Quality
A Split-then-Join Approach to Abstractive Summarization for Very Long Documents in a Low Resource Setting
ConTextual: Improving Clinical Text Summarization in LLMs with Context-preserving Token Filtering and Knowledge Graphs
Advancing Decoding Strategies: Enhancements in Locally Typical Sampling for LLMs
MaCP: Minimal yet Mighty Adaptation via Hierarchical Cosine Projection
DeepSeek vs. o3-mini: How Well can Reasoning LLMs Evaluate MT and Summarization?
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.