Human Judgement as a Compass to Navigate Automatic Metrics for Formality Transfer
원문 초록
Although text style transfer has witnessed rapid development in recent years, there is as yet no established standard for evaluation, which is performed using several automatic metrics, lacking the possibility of always resorting to human judgement. We focus on the task of formality transfer, and on the three aspects that are usually evaluated: style strength, content preservation, and fluency. To cast light on how such aspects are assessed by common and new metrics, we run a human-based evaluation and perform a rich correlation analysis. We are then able to offer some recommendations on the use of such metrics in formality transfer, also with an eye to their generalisability (or not) to related tasks.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Implementing Long Text Style Transfer with LLMs through Dual-Layered Sentence and Paragraph Structure Extraction and Mapping
Counterfactual Explanations for Survival Prediction of Cardiovascular ICU Patients
STRUCTSENSE: A Task-Agnostic Agentic Framework for Structured Information Extraction with Human-In-The-Loop Evaluation and Benchmarking
AI Research Agents for Machine Learning: Search, Exploration, and Generalization in MLE-bench
The Decrypto Benchmark for Multi-Agent Reasoning and Theory of Mind
Decide less, communicate more: On the construct validity of end-to-end fact-checking in medicine
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.