Adversarial Learning to Reason in an Arbitrary Logic
원문 초록
Existing approaches to learning to prove theorems focus on particular logics and datasets. In this work, we propose Monte-Carlo simulations guided by reinforcement learning that can work in an arbitrarily specified logic, without any human knowledge or set of problems. Since the algorithm does not need any training dataset, it is able to learn to work with any logical foundation, even when there is no body of proofs or even conjectures available. We practically demonstrate the feasibility of the approach in multiple logical systems. The approach is stronger than training on randomly generated data but weaker than the approaches trained on tailored axiom and conjecture sets. It however allows us to apply machine learning to automated theorem proving for many logics, where no such attempts have been tried to date, such as intuitionistic logic or linear logic.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Formalization
Safe: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via Retrospective Step-aware Formal Verification
LeanExplore: A search engine for Lean 4 declarations
Autoformalization in the Era of Large Language Models: A Survey
DeepTheorem: Advancing LLM Reasoning for Theorem Proving Through Natural Language and Reinforcement Learning
Enumerate-Conjecture-Prove: Formally Solving Answer-Construction Problems in Math Competitions
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.