An Empirical Study of Memorization in NLP
원문 초록
A recent study by Feldman (2020) proposed a long-tail theory to explain the memorization behavior of deep learning models. However, memorization has not been empirically verified in the context of NLP, a gap addressed by this work. In this paper, we use three different NLP tasks to check if the long-tail theory holds. Our experiments demonstrate that top-ranked memorized training instances are likely atypical, and removing the top-memorized training instances leads to a more serious drop in test accuracy compared with removing training instances randomly. Furthermore, we develop an attribution method to better understand why a training instance is memorized. We empirically show that our memorization attribution method is faithful, and share our interesting finding that the top-memorized parts of a training instance tend to be features negatively correlated with the class label.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination
Dataset distillation for memorized data: Soft labels can leak held-out teacher knowledge
LexiMark: Robust Watermarking via Lexical Substitutions to Enhance Membership Verification of an LLM's Textual Training Data
Capacity Matters: a Proof-of-Concept for Transformer Memorization on Real-World Data
Diffusion models under low-noise regime
HeuriGym: An Agentic Benchmark for LLM-Crafted Heuristics in Combinatorial Optimization
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.