Non-neural Models Matter: A Re-evaluation of Neural Referring Expression Generation Systems
원문 초록
In recent years, neural models have often outperformed rule-based and classic Machine Learning approaches in NLG. These classic approaches are now often disregarded, for example when new neural models are evaluated. We argue that they should not be overlooked, since, for some tasks, well-designed non-neural approaches achieve better performance than neural ones. In this paper, the task of generating referring expressions in linguistic context is used as an example. We examined two very different English datasets (WEBNLG and WSJ), and evaluated each algorithm using both automatic and human evaluations. Overall, the results of these evaluations suggest that rule-based systems with simple rule sets achieve on-par or better performance on both datasets compared to state-of-the-art neural REG systems. In the case of the more realistic dataset, WSJ, a machine learning-based system with well-designed linguistic features performed best. We hope that our work can encourage researchers to consider non-neural models in future.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Vision-Language Models Are Not Pragmatically Competent in Referring Expression Generation
Grounding Language in Multi-Perspective Referential Communication
Uni-Med: A Unified Medical Generalist Foundation Model For Multi-Task Learning Via Connector-MoE
Referring Expression Generation in Visually Grounded Dialogue with Discourse-aware Comprehension Guiding
Resilience through Scene Context in Visual Referring Expression Generation
Elysium: Exploring Object-level Perception in Videos via MLLM
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.