What Makes Reading Comprehension Questions Difficult?
원문 초록
For a natural language understanding benchmark to be useful in research, it has to consist of examples that are diverse and difficult enough to discriminate among current and near-future state-of-the-art systems. However, we do not yet know how best to select text sources to collect a variety of challenging examples. In this study, we crowdsource multiple-choice reading comprehension questions for passages taken from seven qualitatively distinct sources, analyzing what attributes of passages contribute to the difficulty and question types of the collected examples. To our surprise, we find that passage source, length, and readability measures do not significantly affect question difficulty. Through our manual annotation of seven reasoning types, we observe several trends between passage sources and reasoning types, e.g., logical reasoning is more often required in questions written for technical passages. These results suggest that when creating a new benchmark dataset, selecting a diverse set of passages can help ensure a diverse range of question types, but that passage difficulty need not be a priority.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
LogiQA 2.0—An Improved Dataset for Logical Reasoning in Natural Language Understanding
LogicOCR: Do Your Large Multimodal Models Excel at Logical Reasoning on Text-Rich Images?
Exploring the Effect of Reinforcement Learning on Video Understanding: Insights from SEED-Bench-R1
Motion-R1: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning and Reinforcement Learning for Human Motion Generation
CP-Router: An Uncertainty-Aware Router Between LLM and LRM
The Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Assessing Content Validity: A Comparative Study with Human Experts
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.