Pareto Optimization or Cascaded Weighted Sum: A Comparison of Concepts
원문 초록
According to the published papers and books since the turn of the century, Pareto optimization is the dominating assessment method for multi-objective nonlinear optimization problems treated by population-based optimizers like Evolutionary Algorithms. However, is it always the method of choice for real-world applications, where either more than four objectives have to be considered, or the same type of task is repeated again and again with only minor modifications, in an automated optimization or planning process? This paper presents a classification of application scenarios and compares the Pareto approach with an extended version of the weighted sum, called cascaded weighted sum, for the different scenarios. Its range of application within the field of multi-objective optimization is discussed as well as its strengths and weaknesses.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization
Randomised Optimism via Competitive Co-Evolution for Matrix Games with Bandit Feedback
Benchmarking MOEAs for solving continuous multi-objective RL problems
Mergenetic: a Simple Evolutionary Model Merging Library
Evolutionary thoughts: integration of large language models and evolutionary algorithms
RainbowPlus: Enhancing Adversarial Prompt Generation via Evolutionary Quality-Diversity Search
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.