Guidelines and Evaluation of Clinical Explainable AI in Medical Image Analysis
원문 초록
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) is essential for enabling clinical users to get informed decision support from AI and comply with evidence-based medical practice. Applying XAI in clinical settings requires proper evaluation criteria to ensure the explanation technique is both technically sound and clinically useful, but specific support is lacking to achieve this goal. To bridge the research gap, we propose the Clinical XAI Guidelines that consist of five criteria a clinical XAI needs to be optimized for. The guidelines recommend choosing an explanation form based on Guideline 1 (G1) Understandability and G2 Clinical relevance. For the chosen explanation form, its specific XAI technique should be optimized for G3 Truthfulness, G4 Informative plausibility, and G5 Computational efficiency. Following the guidelines, we conducted a systematic evaluation on a novel problem of multi-modal medical image explanation with two clinical tasks, and proposed new evaluation metrics accordingly. Sixteen commonly-used heatmap XAI techniques were evaluated and found to be insufficient for clinical use due to their failure in G3 and G4. Our evaluation demonstrated the use of Clinical XAI Guidelines to support the design and evaluation of clinically viable XAI.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Communicating Smartly in the Molecular Domain: Neural Networks in the Internet of Bio-Nano Things
midr: Learning from Black-Box Models by Maximum Interpretation Decomposition
Do Protein Transformers Have Biological Intelligence?
TIMING: Temporality-Aware Integrated Gradients for Time Series Explanation
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Image Analysis: A Comprehensive Survey
Towards Transparent AI: A Survey on Explainable Large Language Models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.