On the Evaluation Metrics for Paraphrase Generation
원문 초록
In this paper we revisit automatic metrics for paraphrase evaluation and obtain two findings that disobey conventional wisdom: (1) Reference-free metrics achieve better performance than their reference-based counterparts. (2) Most commonly used metrics do not align well with human annotation. Underlying reasons behind the above findings are explored through additional experiments and in-depth analyses. Based on the experiments and analyses, we propose ParaScore, a new evaluation metric for paraphrase generation. It possesses the merits of reference-based and reference-free metrics and explicitly models lexical divergence. Experimental results demonstrate that ParaScore significantly outperforms existing metrics.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Enhancing Paraphrase Type Generation: The Impact of DPO and RLHF Evaluated with Human-Ranked Data
Has Machine Translation Evaluation Achieved Human Parity? The Human Reference and the Limits of Progress
CycleDistill: Bootstrapping Machine Translation using LLMs with Cyclical Distillation
ConsistencyChecker: Tree-based Evaluation of LLM Generalization Capabilities
Deep Symmetric Autoencoders from the Eckart-Young-Schmidt Perspective
Gender Bias in English-to-Greek Machine Translation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.