The Inverse Problem for Argumentation Gradual Semantics
원문 초록
Gradual semantics with abstract argumentation provide each argument with a score reflecting its acceptability, i.e. how "much" it is attacked by other arguments. Many different gradual semantics have been proposed in the literature, each following different principles and producing different argument rankings. A sub-class of such semantics, the so-called weighted semantics, takes, in addition to the graph structure, an initial set of weights over the arguments as input, with these weights affecting the resultant argument ranking. In this work, we consider the inverse problem over such weighted semantics. That is, given an argumentation framework and a desired argument ranking, we ask whether there exist initial weights such that a particular semantics produces the given ranking. The contribution of this paper are: (1) an algorithm to answer this problem, (2) a characterisation of the properties that a gradual semantics must satisfy for the algorithm to operate, and (3) an empirical evaluation of the proposed algorithm.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Neuro-Argumentative Learning with Case-Based Reasoning
On the Structure of Game Provenance and its Applications
A Formalisation of Abstract Argumentation in Higher-Order Logic
Deep Learning for Abstract Argumentation Semantics
MisGAN: Learning from Incomplete Data with Generative Adversarial Networks
An argumentative agent-based model of scientific inquiry
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.