Unobserved Local Structures Make Compositional Generalization Hard
원문 초록
While recent work has convincingly showed that sequence-to-sequence models struggle to generalize to new compositions (termed compositional generalization), little is known on what makes compositional generalization hard on a particular test instance. In this work, we investigate what are the factors that make generalization to certain test instances challenging. We first substantiate that indeed some examples are more difficult than others by showing that different models consistently fail or succeed on the same test instances. Then, we propose a criterion for the difficulty of an example: a test instance is hard if it contains a local structure that was not observed at training time. We formulate a simple decision rule based on this criterion and empirically show it predicts instance-level generalization well across 5 different semantic parsing datasets, substantially better than alternative decision rules. Last, we show local structures can be leveraged for creating difficult adversarial compositional splits and also to improve compositional generalization under limited training budgets by strategically selecting examples for the training set.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Where, What, Why: Towards Explainable Driver Attention Prediction
Sigma: A dataset for text-to-code semantic parsing with statistical analysis
Diverse In-Context Example Selection After Decomposing Programs and Aligned Utterances Improves Semantic Parsing
Disambiguate First Parse Later: Generating Interpretations for Ambiguity Resolution in Semantic Parsing
LP-LM: No Hallucinations in Question Answering with Logic Programming
Ontology-Guided, Hybrid Prompt Learning for Generalization in Knowledge Graph Question Answering
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.