Have I done enough planning or should I plan more?
원문 초록
People's decisions about how to allocate their limited computational resources are essential to human intelligence. An important component of this metacognitive ability is deciding whether to continue thinking about what to do and move on to the next decision. Here, we show that people acquire this ability through learning and reverse-engineer the underlying learning mechanisms. Using a process-tracing paradigm that externalises human planning, we find that people quickly adapt how much planning they perform to the cost and benefit of planning. To discover the underlying metacognitive learning mechanisms we augmented a set of reinforcement learning models with metacognitive features and performed Bayesian model selection. Our results suggest that the metacognitive ability to adjust the amount of planning might be learned through a policy-gradient mechanism that is guided by metacognitive pseudo-rewards that communicate the value of planning.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
mTSBench: Benchmarking Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection and Model Selection at Scale
Leveraging Predictive Equivalence in Decision Trees
The use of cross validation in the analysis of designed experiments
Router-R1: Teaching LLMs Multi-Round Routing and Aggregation via Reinforcement Learning
Tuning the Right Foundation Models is What you Need for Partial Label Learning
Behavioral Augmentation of UML Class Diagrams: An Empirical Study of Large Language Models for Method Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.