When are Iterative Gaussian Processes Reliably Accurate?
원문 초록
While recent work on conjugate gradient methods and Lanczos decompositions have achieved scalable Gaussian process inference with highly accurate point predictions, in several implementations these iterative methods appear to struggle with numerical instabilities in learning kernel hyperparameters, and poor test likelihoods. By investigating CG tolerance, preconditioner rank, and Lanczos decomposition rank, we provide a particularly simple prescription to correct these issues: we recommend that one should use a small CG tolerance ($\epsilon \leq 0.01$) and a large root decomposition size ($r \geq 5000$). Moreover, we show that L-BFGS-B is a compelling optimizer for Iterative GPs, achieving convergence with fewer gradient updates.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Statistical Machine Learning for Astronomy -- A Textbook
LLINBO: Trustworthy LLM-in-the-Loop Bayesian Optimization
MathOptAI.jl: Embed trained machine learning predictors into JuMP models
Tailored Architectures for Time Series Forecasting: Evaluating Deep Learning Models on Gaussian Process-Generated Data
The Currents of Conflict: Decomposing Conflict Trends with Gaussian Processes
Few-Shot Speech Deepfake Detection Adaptation with Gaussian Processes
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.