Comparing radiologists' gaze and saliency maps generated by interpretability methods for chest x-rays
원문 초록
The interpretability of medical image analysis models is considered a key research field. We use a dataset of eye-tracking data from five radiologists to compare the outputs of interpretability methods and the heatmaps representing where radiologists looked. We conduct a class-independent analysis of the saliency maps generated by two methods selected from the literature: Grad-CAM and attention maps from an attention-gated model. For the comparison, we use shuffled metrics, which avoid biases from fixation locations. We achieve scores comparable to an interobserver baseline in one shuffled metric, highlighting the potential of saliency maps from Grad-CAM to mimic a radiologist's attention over an image. We also divide the dataset into subsets to evaluate in which cases similarities are higher.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Taming Vision-Language Models for Medical Image Analysis: A Comprehensive Review
Conquering the Retina: Bringing Visual in-Context Learning to OCT
Autonomous Computer Vision Development with Agentic AI
SSS: Semi-Supervised SAM-2 with Efficient Prompting for Medical Imaging Segmentation
DrVD-Bench: Do Vision-Language Models Reason Like Human Doctors in Medical Image Diagnosis?
Comparing the Effects of Persistence Barcodes Aggregation and Feature Concatenation on Medical Imaging
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.