Can we Fix the Scope for Coreference? Problems and Solutions for Benchmarks beyond OntoNotes
원문 초록
Current work on automatic coreference resolution has focused on the OntoNotes benchmark dataset, due to both its size and consistency. However many aspects of the OntoNotes annotation scheme are not well understood by NLP practitioners, including the treatment of generic NPs, noun modifiers, indefinite anaphora, predication and more. These often lead to counterintuitive claims, results and system behaviors. This opinion piece aims to highlight some of the problems with the OntoNotes rendition of coreference, and to propose a way forward relying on three principles: 1. a focus on semantics, not morphosyntax; 2. cross-linguistic generalizability; and 3. a separation of identity and scope, which can resolve old problems involving temporal and modal domain consistency.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Disambiguating Reference in Visually Grounded Dialogues through Joint Modeling of Textual and Multimodal Semantic Structures
Long-context Non-factoid Question Answering in Indic Languages
RAKG:Document-level Retrieval Augmented Knowledge Graph Construction
LegalCore: A Dataset for Legal Documents Event Coreference Resolution
The Role of Natural Language Processing Tasks in Automatic Literary Character Network Construction
IdentifyMe: A Challenging Long-Context Mention Resolution Benchmark for LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.