A Validation Tool for Designing Reinforcement Learning Environments
원문 초록
Reinforcement learning (RL) has gained increasing attraction in the academia and tech industry with launches to a variety of impactful applications and products. Although research is being actively conducted on many fronts (e.g., offline RL, performance, etc.), many RL practitioners face a challenge that has been largely ignored: determine whether a designed Markov Decision Process (MDP) is valid and meaningful. This study proposes a heuristic-based feature analysis method to validate whether an MDP is well formulated. We believe an MDP suitable for applying RL should contain a set of state features that are both sensitive to actions and predictive in rewards. We tested our method in constructed environments showing that our approach can identify certain invalid environment formulations. As far as we know, performing validity analysis for RL problem formulation is a novel direction. We envision that our tool will serve as a motivational example to help practitioners apply RL in real-world problems more easily.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Policy-Based Trajectory Clustering in Offline Reinforcement Learning
Sparse-Reg: Improving Sample Complexity in Offline Reinforcement Learning using Sparsity
DR-SAC: Distributionally Robust Soft Actor-Critic for Reinforcement Learning under Uncertainty
From Novelty to Imitation: Self-Distilled Rewards for Offline Reinforcement Learning
High-Throughput Distributed Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Policy Synchronization
Step-wise Policy for Rare-tool Knowledge (SPaRK): Offline RL that Drives Diverse Tool Use in LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.