Avoiding C-hacking when evaluating survival distribution predictions with discrimination measures
원문 초록
In this paper we consider how to evaluate survival distribution predictions with measures of discrimination. This is a non-trivial problem as discrimination measures are the most commonly used in survival analysis and yet there is no clear method to derive a risk prediction from a distribution prediction. We survey methods proposed in literature and software and consider their respective advantages and disadvantages. Whilst distributions are frequently evaluated by discrimination measures, we find that the method for doing so is rarely described in the literature and often leads to unfair comparisons. We find that the most robust method of reducing a distribution to a risk is to sum over the predicted cumulative hazard. We recommend that machine learning survival analysis software implements clear transformations between distribution and risk predictions in order to allow more transparent and accessible model evaluation. The code used in the final experiment is available at https://github.com/RaphaelS1/distribution_discrimination.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Survival Analysis as Imprecise Classification with Trainable Kernels
SurvUnc: A Meta-Model Based Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Survival Analysis
Multimodal Cancer Survival Analysis via Hypergraph Learning with Cross-Modality Rebalance
Multi-Resolution Pathology-Language Pre-training Model with Text-Guided Visual Representation
Beyond Cox Models: Assessing the Performance of Machine-Learning Methods in Non-Proportional Hazards and Non-Linear Survival Analysis
Offline Dynamic Inventory and Pricing Strategy: Addressing Censored and Dependent Demand
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.