Examining Zero-Shot Vulnerability Repair with Large Language Models
원문 초록
Human developers can produce code with cybersecurity bugs. Can emerging 'smart' code completion tools help repair those bugs? In this work, we examine the use of large language models (LLMs) for code (such as OpenAI's Codex and AI21's Jurassic J-1) for zero-shot vulnerability repair. We investigate challenges in the design of prompts that coax LLMs into generating repaired versions of insecure code. This is difficult due to the numerous ways to phrase key information - both semantically and syntactically - with natural languages. We perform a large scale study of five commercially available, black-box, "off-the-shelf" LLMs, as well as an open-source model and our own locally-trained model, on a mix of synthetic, hand-crafted, and real-world security bug scenarios. Our experiments demonstrate that while the approach has promise (the LLMs could collectively repair 100% of our synthetically generated and hand-crafted scenarios), a qualitative evaluation of the model's performance over a corpus of historical real-world examples highlights challenges in generating functionally correct code.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Seed-Coder: Let the Code Model Curate Data for Itself
SWE-Dev: Evaluating and Training Autonomous Feature-Driven Software Development
Can You Really Trust Code Copilots? Evaluating Large Language Models from a Code Security Perspective
ObscuraCoder: Powering Efficient Code LM Pre-Training Via Obfuscation Grounding
LogQuant: Log-Distributed 2-Bit Quantization of KV Cache with Superior Accuracy Preservation
Enhancing High-Quality Code Generation in Large Language Models with Comparative Prefix-Tuning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.