Exploring the Limits of Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification in Low-Shot Settings
원문 초록
Uncertainty quantification in neural network promises to increase safety of AI systems, but it is not clear how performance might vary with the training set size. In this paper we evaluate seven uncertainty methods on Fashion MNIST and CIFAR10, as we sub-sample and produce varied training set sizes. We find that calibration error and out of distribution detection performance strongly depend on the training set size, with most methods being miscalibrated on the test set with small training sets. Gradient-based methods seem to poorly estimate epistemic uncertainty and are the most affected by training set size. We expect our results can guide future research into uncertainty quantification and help practitioners select methods based on their particular available data.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Contextual Similarity Distillation: Ensemble Uncertainties with a Single Model
Statistical Machine Learning for Astronomy -- A Textbook
Interpretable Bayesian Tensor Network Kernel Machines with Automatic Rank and Feature Selection
Estimating prevalence with precision and accuracy
UQLM: A Python Package for Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models
FA: Forced Prompt Learning of Vision-Language Models for Out-of-Distribution Detection
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.