New Performance Measures for Object Tracking under Complex Environments
원문 초록
Various performance measures based on the ground truth and without ground truth exist to evaluate the quality of a developed tracking algorithm. The existing popular measures - average center location error (ACLE) and average tracking accuracy (ATA) based on ground truth, may sometimes create confusion to quantify the quality of a developed algorithm for tracking an object under some complex environments (e.g., scaled or oriented or both scaled and oriented object). In this article, we propose three new auxiliary performance measures based on ground truth information to evaluate the quality of a developed tracking algorithm under such complex environments. Moreover, one performance measure is developed by combining both two existing measures ACLE and ATA and three new proposed measures for better quantifying the developed tracking algorithm under such complex conditions. Some examples and experimental results conclude that the proposed measure is better than existing measures to quantify one developed algorithm for tracking objects under such complex environments.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
HiM2SAM: Enhancing SAM2 with Hierarchical Motion Estimation and Memory Optimization towards Long-term Tracking
UMDATrack: Unified Multi-Domain Adaptive Tracking Under Adverse Weather Conditions
Mamba-FETrack V2: Revisiting State Space Model for Frame-Event based Visual Object Tracking
Visual and Memory Dual Adapter for Multi-Modal Object Tracking
R1-Track: Direct Application of MLLMs to Visual Object Tracking via Reinforcement Learning
RGBTrack: Fast, Robust Depth-Free 6D Pose Estimation and Tracking
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.