Counterfactual Shapley Additive Explanations
원문 초록
Feature attributions are a common paradigm for model explanations due to their simplicity in assigning a single numeric score for each input feature to a model. In the actionable recourse setting, wherein the goal of the explanations is to improve outcomes for model consumers, it is often unclear how feature attributions should be correctly used. With this work, we aim to strengthen and clarify the link between actionable recourse and feature attributions. Concretely, we propose a variant of SHAP, Counterfactual SHAP (CF-SHAP), that incorporates counterfactual information to produce a background dataset for use within the marginal (a.k.a. interventional) Shapley value framework. We motivate the need within the actionable recourse setting for careful consideration of background datasets when using Shapley values for feature attributions with numerous synthetic examples. Moreover, we demonstrate the efficacy of CF-SHAP by proposing and justifying a quantitative score for feature attributions, counterfactual-ability, showing that as measured by this metric, CF-SHAP is superior to existing methods when evaluated on public datasets using tree ensembles.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Analyzing and Improving the Robustness of Tabular Classifiers using Counterfactual Explanations
Graph Style Transfer for Counterfactual Explainability
COMRECGC: Global Graph Counterfactual Explainer through Common Recourse
What's Wrong with Your Synthetic Tabular Data? Using Explainable AI to Evaluate Generative Models
Generalized Semantic Contrastive Learning via Embedding Side Information for Few-Shot Object Detection
The Role of Explanation Styles and Perceived Accuracy on Decision Making in Predictive Process Monitoring
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.