Can Explanations Be Useful for Calibrating Black Box Models?
원문 초록
NLP practitioners often want to take existing trained models and apply them to data from new domains. While fine-tuning or few-shot learning can be used to adapt a base model, there is no single recipe for making these techniques work; moreover, one may not have access to the original model weights if it is deployed as a black box. We study how to improve a black box model's performance on a new domain by leveraging explanations of the model's behavior. Our approach first extracts a set of features combining human intuition about the task with model attributions generated by black box interpretation techniques, then uses a simple calibrator, in the form of a classifier, to predict whether the base model was correct or not. We experiment with our method on two tasks, extractive question answering and natural language inference, covering adaptation from several pairs of domains with limited target-domain data. The experimental results across all the domain pairs show that explanations are useful for calibrating these models, boosting accuracy when predictions do not have to be returned on every example. We further show that the calibration model transfers to some extent between tasks.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Drop Dropout on Single-Epoch Language Model Pretraining
S2LPP: Small-to-Large Prompt Prediction across LLMs
LogiQA 2.0—An Improved Dataset for Logical Reasoning in Natural Language Understanding
Text-Embedded Bilinear Model for Fine-Grained Visual Recognition
From Roots to Rewards: Dynamic Tree Reasoning with RL
Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.