Multi-task problems are not multi-objective
원문 초록
Multi-objective optimization (MOO) aims at finding a set of optimal configurations for a given set of objectives. A recent line of work applies MOO methods to the typical Machine Learning (ML) setting, which becomes multi-objective if a model should optimize more than one objective, for instance in fair machine learning. These works also use Multi-Task Learning (MTL) problems to benchmark MOO algorithms treating each task as independent objective. In this work we show that MTL problems do not resemble the characteristics of MOO problems. In particular, MTL losses are not competing in case of a sufficiently expressive single model. As a consequence, a single model can perform just as well as optimizing all objectives with independent models, rendering MOO inapplicable. We provide evidence with extensive experiments on the widely used Multi-Fashion-MNIST datasets. Our results call for new benchmarks to evaluate MOO algorithms for ML. Our code is available at: https://github.com/ruchtem/moo-mtl.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Robust-Multi-Task Gradient Boosting
SAMO: A Lightweight Sharpness-Aware Approach for Multi-Task Optimization with Joint Global-Local Perturbation
SonicVerse: Multi-Task Learning for Music Feature-Informed Captioning
CALM: Consensus-Aware Localized Merging for Multi-Task Learning
Training-free LLM Merging for Multi-task Learning
Non-Contact Health Monitoring During Daily Personal Care Routines
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.