Decision-Theoretic Question Generation for Situated Reference Resolution: An Empirical Study and Computational Model
원문 초록
Dialogue agents that interact with humans in situated environments need to manage referential ambiguity across multiple modalities and ask for help as needed. However, it is not clear what kinds of questions such agents should ask nor how the answers to such questions can be used to resolve ambiguity. To address this, we analyzed dialogue data from an interactive study in which participants controlled a virtual robot tasked with organizing a set of tools while engaging in dialogue with a live, remote experimenter. We discovered a number of novel results, including the distribution of question types used to resolve ambiguity and the influence of dialogue-level factors on the reference resolution process. Based on these empirical findings we: (1) developed a computational model for clarification requests using a decision network with an entropy-based utility assignment method that operates across modalities, (2) evaluated the model, showing that it outperforms a slot-filling baseline in environments of varying ambiguity, and (3) interpreted the results to offer insight into the ways that agents can ask questions to facilitate situated reference resolution.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Bench4KE: Benchmarking Automated Competency Question Generation
Ask, Retrieve, Summarize: A Modular Pipeline for Scientific Literature Summarization
Multi-Hop Question Generation via Dual-Perspective Keyword Guidance
KG-QAGen: A Knowledge-Graph-Based Framework for Systematic Question Generation and Long-Context LLM Evaluation
Enhancing the Learning Experience: Using Vision-Language Models to Generate Questions for Educational Videos
Harnessing Structured Knowledge: A Concept Map-Based Approach for High-Quality Multiple Choice Question Generation with Effective Distractors
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.