Multi-Agent Algorithmic Recourse
원문 초록
The recent adoption of machine learning as a tool in real world decision making has spurred interest in understanding how these decisions are being made. Counterfactual Explanations are a popular interpretable machine learning technique that aims to understand how a machine learning model would behave if given alternative inputs. Many explanations attempt to go further and recommend actions an individual could take to obtain a more desirable output from the model. These recommendations are known as algorithmic recourse. Past work has largely focused on the effect algorithmic recourse has on a single agent. In this work, we show that when the assumption of a single agent environment is relaxed, current approaches to algorithmic recourse fail to guarantee certain ethically desirable properties. Instead, we propose a new game theory inspired framework for providing algorithmic recourse in a multi-agent environment that does guarantee these properties.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Turning Sand to Gold: Recycling Data to Bridge On-Policy and Off-Policy Learning via Causal Bound
Social Group Bias in AI Finance
CF-Seg: Counterfactuals meet Segmentation
The Role of Explanation Styles and Perceived Accuracy on Decision Making in Predictive Process Monitoring
Explainable Debugger for Black-box Machine Learning Models
Counterfactual Explanations for Survival Prediction of Cardiovascular ICU Patients
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.