Classifying Dyads for Militarized Conflict Analysis
원문 초록
Understanding the origins of militarized conflict is a complex, yet important undertaking. Existing research seeks to build this understanding by considering bi-lateral relationships between entity pairs (dyadic causes) and multi-lateral relationships among multiple entities (systemic causes). The aim of this work is to compare these two causes in terms of how they correlate with conflict between two entities. We do this by devising a set of textual and graph-based features which represent each of the causes. The features are extracted from Wikipedia and modeled as a large graph. Nodes in this graph represent entities connected by labeled edges representing ally or enemy-relationships. This allows casting the problem as an edge classification task, which we term dyad classification. We propose and evaluate classifiers to determine if a particular pair of entities are allies or enemies. Our results suggest that our systemic features might be slightly better correlates of conflict. Further, we find that Wikipedia articles of allies are semantically more similar than enemies.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
AI Wizards at CheckThat! 2025: Enhancing Transformer-Based Embeddings with Sentiment for Subjectivity Detection in News Articles
Remember Past, Anticipate Future: Learning Continual Multimodal Misinformation Detectors
Narrative Shift Detection: A Hybrid Approach of Dynamic Topic Models and Large Language Models
Characterizing Linguistic Shifts in Croatian News via Diachronic Word Embeddings
How Grounded is Wikipedia? A Study on Structured Evidential Support
Intent Factored Generation: Unleashing the Diversity in Your Language Model
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.