Deciding Whether to Ask Clarifying Questions in Large-Scale Spoken Language Understanding
원문 초록
A large-scale conversational agent can suffer from understanding user utterances with various ambiguities such as ASR ambiguity, intent ambiguity, and hypothesis ambiguity. When ambiguities are detected, the agent should engage in a clarifying dialog to resolve the ambiguities before committing to actions. However, asking clarifying questions for all the ambiguity occurrences could lead to asking too many questions, essentially hampering the user experience. To trigger clarifying questions only when necessary for the user satisfaction, we propose a neural self-attentive model that leverages the hypotheses with ambiguities and contextual signals. We conduct extensive experiments on five common ambiguity types using real data from a large-scale commercial conversational agent and demonstrate significant improvement over a set of baseline approaches.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
MMSU: A Massive Multi-task Spoken Language Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark
"KAN you hear me?" Exploring Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for Spoken Language Understanding
"Alexa, can you forget me?" Machine Unlearning Benchmark in Spoken Language Understanding
QUADS: QUAntized Distillation Framework for Efficient Speech Language Understanding
LiveLongBench: Tackling Long-Context Understanding for Spoken Texts from Live Streams
Measuring the Effect of Transcription Noise on Downstream Language Understanding Tasks
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.