TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods
원문 초록
We propose a benchmark to measure whether a language model is truthful in generating answers to questions. The benchmark comprises 817 questions that span 38 categories, including health, law, finance and politics. We crafted questions that some humans would answer falsely due to a false belief or misconception. To perform well, models must avoid generating false answers learned from imitating human texts. We tested GPT-3, GPT-Neo/J, GPT-2 and a T5-based model. The best model was truthful on 58% of questions, while human performance was 94%. Models generated many false answers that mimic popular misconceptions and have the potential to deceive humans. The largest models were generally the least truthful. This contrasts with other NLP tasks, where performance improves with model size. However, this result is expected if false answers are learned from the training distribution. We suggest that scaling up models alone is less promising for improving truthfulness than fine-tuning using training objectives other than imitation of text from the web.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images
SeqPE: Transformer with Sequential Position Encoding
Bridging the Gap Between Open-Source and Proprietary LLMs in Table QA
Is This Just Fantasy? Language Model Representations Reflect Human Judgments of Event Plausibility
OpenTable-R1: A Reinforcement Learning Augmented Tool Agent for Open-Domain Table Question Answering
Large Language Model Agent for Modular Task Execution in Drug Discovery
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.