Which One is Better: Assessing Objective Metrics for Point Cloud Compression
원문 초록
Point cloud compression (PCC) has made remarkable achievement in recent years. In the mean time, point cloud quality assessment (PCQA) also realize gratifying development. Some recently emerged metrics present robust performance on public point cloud assessment databases. However, these metrics have not been evaluated specifically for PCC to verify whether they exhibit consistent performance with the subjective perception. In this paper, we establish a new dataset for compression evaluation first, which contains 175 compressed point clouds in total, deriving from 7 compression algorithms with 5 compression levels. Then leveraging the proposed dataset, we evaluate the performance of the existing PCQA metrics in terms of different compression types. The results demonstrate some deficiencies of existing metrics in compression evaluation.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
The Worse The Better: Content-Aware Viewpoint Generation Network for Projection-related Point Cloud Quality Assessment
No-reference geometry quality assessment for colorless point clouds via list-wise rank learning
CLIP-PCQA: Exploring Subjective-Aligned Vision-Language Modeling for Point Cloud Quality Assessment
No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Graph Convolutional Network
Perceptual Quality Assessment of Trisoup-Lifting Encoded 3D Point Clouds
Asynchronous Feedback Network for Perceptual Point Cloud Quality Assessment
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.