Factual Consistency Evaluation for Text Summarization via Counterfactual Estimation
원문 초록
Despite significant progress has been achieved in text summarization, factual inconsistency in generated summaries still severely limits its practical applications. Among the key factors to ensure factual consistency, a reliable automatic evaluation metric is the first and the most crucial one. However, existing metrics either neglect the intrinsic cause of the factual inconsistency or rely on auxiliary tasks, leading to an unsatisfied correlation with human judgments or increasing the inconvenience of usage in practice. In light of these challenges, we propose a novel metric to evaluate the factual consistency in text summarization via counterfactual estimation, which formulates the causal relationship among the source document, the generated summary, and the language prior. We remove the effect of language prior, which can cause factual inconsistency, from the total causal effect on the generated summary, and provides a simple yet effective way to evaluate consistency without relying on other auxiliary tasks. We conduct a series of experiments on three public abstractive text summarization datasets, and demonstrate the advantages of the proposed metric in both improving the correlation with human judgments and the convenience of usage. The source code is available at https://github.com/xieyxclack/factual_coco.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
A Split-then-Join Approach to Abstractive Summarization for Very Long Documents in a Low Resource Setting
ARLED: Leveraging LED-based ARMAN Model for Abstractive Summarization of Persian Long Documents
A Hybrid Architecture with Efficient Fine Tuning for Abstractive Patent Document Summarization
Advancements in Natural Language Processing for Automatic Text Summarization
BRIDO: Bringing Democratic Order to Abstractive Summarization
APE: Selective Fine-tuning with Acceptance Criteria for Language Model Adaptation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.