Polarity in the Classroom: A Case Study Leveraging Peer Sentiment Toward Scalable Assessment
원문 초록
Accurately grading open-ended assignments in large or massive open online courses (MOOCs) is non-trivial. Peer review is a promising solution but can be unreliable due to few reviewers and an unevaluated review form. To date, no work has 1) leveraged sentiment analysis in the peer-review process to inform or validate grades or 2) utilized aspect extraction to craft a review form from what students actually communicated. Our work utilizes, rather than discards, student data from review form comments to deliver better information to the instructor. In this work, we detail the process by which we create our domain-dependent lexicon and aspect-informed review form as well as our entire sentiment analysis algorithm which provides a fine-grained sentiment score from text alone. We end by analyzing validity and discussing conclusions from our corpus of over 6800 peer reviews from nine courses to understand the viability of sentiment in the classroom for increasing the information from and reliability of grading open-ended assignments in large courses.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
An Aspect Extraction Framework using Different Embedding Types, Learning Models, and Dependency Structure
PL-FGSA: A Prompt Learning Framework for Fine-Grained Sentiment Analysis Based on MindSpore
From Annotation to Adaptation: Metrics, Synthetic Data, and Aspect Extraction for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis with Large Language Models
Towards a One-stop Solution to Both Aspect Extraction and Sentiment Analysis Tasks with Neural Multi-task Learning
Understanding and Tackling Label Errors in Individual-Level Nature Language Understanding
DCR: Quantifying Data Contamination in LLMs Evaluation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.