Objective video quality metrics application to video codecs comparisons: choosing the best for subjective quality estimation
원문 초록
Quality assessment plays a key role in creating and comparing video compression algorithms. Despite the development of a large number of new methods for assessing quality, generally accepted and well-known codecs comparisons mainly use the classical methods like PSNR, SSIM and new method VMAF. These methods can be calculated following different rules: they can use different frame-by-frame averaging techniques or different summation of color components. In this paper, a fundamental comparison of various versions of generally accepted metrics is carried out to find the most relevant and recommended versions of video quality metrics to be used in codecs comparisons. For comparison, we used a set of videos encoded with video codecs of different standards, and visual quality scores collected for the resulting set of streams since 2018 until 2021
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
MCUCoder: Adaptive Bitrate Learned Video Compression for IoT Devices
Radiance Field Delta Video Compression in Edge-Enabled Vehicular Metaverse
Joint Optimization for SSIM-Based CTU-Level Bit Allocation and Rate Distortion Optimization
Residual Prior-driven Frequency-aware Network for Image Fusion
Video Compression for Spatiotemporal Earth System Data
Cloud-Aware SAR Fusion for Enhanced Optical Sensing in Space Missions
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.