Partial Wasserstein and Maximum Mean Discrepancy distances for bridging the gap between outlier detection and drift detection
원문 초록
With the rise of machine learning and deep learning based applications in practice, monitoring, i.e. verifying that these operate within specification, has become an important practical problem. An important aspect of this monitoring is to check whether the inputs (or intermediates) have strayed from the distribution they were validated for, which can void the performance assurances obtained during testing. There are two common approaches for this. The, perhaps, more classical one is outlier detection or novelty detection, where, for a single input we ask whether it is an outlier, i.e. exceedingly unlikely to have originated from a reference distribution. The second, perhaps more recent approach, is to consider a larger number of inputs and compare its distribution to a reference distribution (e.g. sampled during testing). This is done under the label drift detection. In this work, we bridge the gap between outlier detection and drift detection through comparing a given number of inputs to an automatically chosen part of the reference distribution.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
WePaMaDM-Outlier Detection: Weighted Outlier Detection using Pattern Approaches for Mass Data Mining
Robust Spatiotemporal Epidemic Modeling with Integrated Adaptive Outlier Detection
Lite-RVFL: A Lightweight Random Vector Functional-Link Neural Network for Learning Under Concept Drift
Diversify and Conquer: Open-set Disagreement for Robust Semi-supervised Learning with Outliers
Importance Sampling for Nonlinear Models
Benign Samples Matter! Fine-tuning On Outlier Benign Samples Severely Breaks Safety
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.