Subjective Bias in Abstractive Summarization
원문 초록
Due to the subjectivity of the summarization, it is a good practice to have more than one gold summary for each training document. However, many modern large-scale abstractive summarization datasets have only one-to-one samples written by different human with different styles. The impact of this phenomenon is understudied. We formulate the differences among possible multiple expressions summarizing the same content as subjective bias and examine the role of this bias in the context of abstractive summarization. In this paper a lightweight and effective method to extract the feature embeddings of subjective styles is proposed. Results of summarization models trained on style-clustered datasets show that there are certain types of styles that lead to better convergence, abstraction and generalization. The reproducible code and generated summaries are available online.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Power-Law Decay Loss for Large Language Model Finetuning: Focusing on Information Sparsity to Enhance Generation Quality
Enhancing Abstractive Summarization of Scientific Papers Using Structure Information
Low-Resource Language Processing: An OCR-Driven Summarization and Translation Pipeline
A Split-then-Join Approach to Abstractive Summarization for Very Long Documents in a Low Resource Setting
GASCADE: Grouped Summarization of Adverse Drug Event for Enhanced Cancer Pharmacovigilance
AIstorian lets AI be a historian: A KG-powered multi-agent system for accurate biography generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.