Mitigating Biases in Toxic Language Detection through Invariant Rationalization
원문 초록
Automatic detection of toxic language plays an essential role in protecting social media users, especially minority groups, from verbal abuse. However, biases toward some attributes, including gender, race, and dialect, exist in most training datasets for toxicity detection. The biases make the learned models unfair and can even exacerbate the marginalization of people. Considering that current debiasing methods for general natural language understanding tasks cannot effectively mitigate the biases in the toxicity detectors, we propose to use invariant rationalization (InvRat), a game-theoretic framework consisting of a rationale generator and a predictor, to rule out the spurious correlation of certain syntactic patterns (e.g., identity mentions, dialect) to toxicity labels. We empirically show that our method yields lower false positive rate in both lexical and dialectal attributes than previous debiasing methods.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Understanding and Tackling Label Errors in Individual-Level Nature Language Understanding
Vision Language Action Models in Robotic Manipulation: A Systematic Review
A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving
Dialect Normalization using Large Language Models and Morphological Rules
EdgeProfiler: A Fast Profiling Framework for Lightweight LLMs on Edge Using Analytical Model
Can Compressed LLMs Truly Act? An Empirical Evaluation of Agentic Capabilities in LLM Compression
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.