Two Coupled Rejection Metrics Can Tell Adversarial Examples Apart
원문 초록
Correctly classifying adversarial examples is an essential but challenging requirement for safely deploying machine learning models. As reported in RobustBench, even the state-of-the-art adversarially trained models struggle to exceed 67% robust test accuracy on CIFAR-10, which is far from practical. A complementary way towards robustness is to introduce a rejection option, allowing the model to not return predictions on uncertain inputs, where confidence is a commonly used certainty proxy. Along with this routine, we find that confidence and a rectified confidence (R-Con) can form two coupled rejection metrics, which could provably distinguish wrongly classified inputs from correctly classified ones. This intriguing property sheds light on using coupling strategies to better detect and reject adversarial examples. We evaluate our rectified rejection (RR) module on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-10-C, and CIFAR-100 under several attacks including adaptive ones, and demonstrate that the RR module is compatible with different adversarial training frameworks on improving robustness, with little extra computation. The code is available at https://github.com/P2333/Rectified-Rejection.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Quantile-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning using Two-Timescale Policy Gradient Algorithms
Leveraging the two timescale regime to demonstrate convergence of neural networks
Training a Two Layer ReLU Network Analytically
MiniRBT: A Two-stage Distilled Small Chinese Pre-trained Model
FinalMLP: An Enhanced Two-Stream MLP Model for CTR Prediction
Using Simple Incentives to Improve Two-Sided Fairness in Ridesharing Systems
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.