One Step Preference Elicitation in Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization
원문 초록
We consider a multi-objective optimization problem with objective functions that are expensive to evaluate. The decision maker (DM) has unknown preferences, and so the standard approach is to generate an approximation of the Pareto front and let the DM choose from the generated non-dominated designs. However, especially for expensive to evaluate problems where the number of designs that can be evaluated is very limited, the true best solution according to the DM's unknown preferences is unlikely to be among the small set of non-dominated solutions found, even if these solutions are truly Pareto optimal. We address this issue by using a multi-objective Bayesian optimization algorithm and allowing the DM to select a preferred solution from a predicted continuous Pareto front just once before the end of the algorithm rather than selecting a solution after the end. This allows the algorithm to understand the DM's preferences and make a final attempt to identify a more preferred solution. We demonstrate the idea using ParEGO, and show empirically that the found solutions are significantly better in terms of true DM preferences than if the DM would simply pick a solution at the end.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
LLINBO: Trustworthy LLM-in-the-Loop Bayesian Optimization
Reinforcement Learning Increases Wind Farm Power Production by Enabling Closed-Loop Collaborative Control
Fast Bayesian Optimization of Function Networks with Partial Evaluations
Amortized variational transdimensional inference
VirnyFlow: A Design Space for Responsible Model Development
Bridging Quantum and Classical Computing in Drug Design: Architecture Principles for Improved Molecule Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.