Rationalization through Concepts
원문 초록
Automated predictions require explanations to be interpretable by humans. One type of explanation is a rationale, i.e., a selection of input features such as relevant text snippets from which the model computes the outcome. However, a single overall selection does not provide a complete explanation, e.g., weighing several aspects for decisions. To this end, we present a novel self-interpretable model called ConRAT. Inspired by how human explanations for high-level decisions are often based on key concepts, ConRAT extracts a set of text snippets as concepts and infers which ones are described in the document. Then, it explains the outcome with a linear aggregation of concepts. Two regularizers drive ConRAT to build interpretable concepts. In addition, we propose two techniques to boost the rationale and predictive performance further. Experiments on both single- and multi-aspect sentiment classification tasks show that ConRAT is the first to generate concepts that align with human rationalization while using only the overall label. Further, it outperforms state-of-the-art methods trained on each aspect label independently.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
A Personalized Conversational Benchmark: Towards Simulating Personalized Conversations
Divide (Text) and Conquer (Sentiment): Improved Sentiment Classification by Constituent Conflict Resolution
Bug Destiny Prediction in Large Open-Source Software Repositories through Sentiment Analysis and BERT Topic Modeling
Breaking BERT: Gradient Attack on Twitter Sentiment Analysis for Targeted Misclassification
ELECTRA and GPT-4o: Cost-Effective Partners for Sentiment Analysis
On the Applicability of Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer Learning for Sentiment Classification in Distant Language Pairs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.