Not All Relevance Scores are Equal: Efficient Uncertainty and Calibration Modeling for Deep Retrieval Models
원문 초록
In any ranking system, the retrieval model outputs a single score for a document based on its belief on how relevant it is to a given search query. While retrieval models have continued to improve with the introduction of increasingly complex architectures, few works have investigated a retrieval model's belief in the score beyond the scope of a single value. We argue that capturing the model's uncertainty with respect to its own scoring of a document is a critical aspect of retrieval that allows for greater use of current models across new document distributions, collections, or even improving effectiveness for down-stream tasks. In this paper, we address this problem via an efficient Bayesian framework for retrieval models which captures the model's belief in the relevance score through a stochastic process while adding only negligible computational overhead. We evaluate this belief via a ranking based calibration metric showing that our approximate Bayesian framework significantly improves a retrieval model's ranking effectiveness through a risk aware reranking as well as its confidence calibration. Lastly, we demonstrate that this additional uncertainty information is actionable and reliable on down-stream tasks represented via cutoff prediction.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
JointRank: Rank Large Set with Single Pass
Constructing and Evaluating Declarative RAG Pipelines in PyTerrier
Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models
SARA: Selective and Adaptive Retrieval-augmented Generation with Context Compression
Mask-aware Text-to-Image Retrieval: Referring Expression Segmentation Meets Cross-modal Retrieval
Leveraging LLM-Assisted Query Understanding for Live Retrieval-Augmented Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.