Abuse is Contextual, What about NLP? The Role of Context in Abusive Language Annotation and Detection
원문 초록
The datasets most widely used for abusive language detection contain lists of messages, usually tweets, that have been manually judged as abusive or not by one or more annotators, with the annotation performed at message level. In this paper, we investigate what happens when the hateful content of a message is judged also based on the context, given that messages are often ambiguous and need to be interpreted in the context of occurrence. We first re-annotate part of a widely used dataset for abusive language detection in English in two conditions, i.e. with and without context. Then, we compare the performance of three classification algorithms obtained on these two types of dataset, arguing that a context-aware classification is more challenging but also more similar to a real application scenario.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
A Multi-Task Benchmark for Abusive Language Detection in Low-Resource Settings
AfriHate: A Multilingual Collection of Hate Speech and Abusive Language Datasets for African Languages
Towards Efficient and Explainable Hate Speech Detection via Model Distillation
Using Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models to Identify Indicators of Vulnerability in Police Incident Narratives
Towards Cross-Lingual Audio Abuse Detection in Low-Resource Settings with Few-Shot Learning
EkoHate: Abusive Language and Hate Speech Detection for Code-switched Political Discussions on Nigerian Twitter
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.