Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measures: New Developments
원문 초록
This work is an update of a previous paper on the same topic published a few years ago. With the dramatic progress in generative modeling, a suite of new quantitative and qualitative techniques to evaluate models has emerged. Although some measures such as Inception Score, Frechet Inception Distance, Precision-Recall, and Perceptual Path Length are relatively more popular, GAN evaluation is not a settled issue and there is still room for improvement. Here, I describe new dimensions that are becoming important in assessing models (e.g. bias and fairness) and discuss the connection between GAN evaluation and deepfakes. These are important areas of concern in the machine learning community today and progress in GAN evaluation can help mitigate them.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
A Reproducibility Study of Product-side Fairness in Bundle Recommendation
Fairness-Aware Grouping for Continuous Sensitive Variables: Application for Debiasing Face Analysis with respect to Skin Tone
Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models
Fairness Is Not Enough: Auditing Competence and Intersectional Bias in AI-powered Resume Screening
Datasets for Fairness in Language Models: An In-Depth Survey
hyperFA*IR: A hypergeometric approach to fair rankings with finite candidate pool
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.