How Many Data Points is a Prompt Worth?
원문 초록
When fine-tuning pretrained models for classification, researchers either use a generic model head or a task-specific prompt for prediction. Proponents of prompting have argued that prompts provide a method for injecting task-specific guidance, which is beneficial in low-data regimes. We aim to quantify this benefit through rigorous testing of prompts in a fair setting: comparing prompted and head-based fine-tuning in equal conditions across many tasks and data sizes. By controlling for many sources of advantage, we find that prompting does indeed provide a benefit, and that this benefit can be quantified per task. Results show that prompting is often worth 100s of data points on average across classification tasks.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Generative Adversarial Minority Oversampling for Spectral-Spatial Hyperspectral Image Classification
Attention-Based Adaptive Spectral-Spatial Kernel ResNet for Hyperspectral Image Classification
Image and Text fusion for UPMC Food-101 \\using BERT and CNNs
Kidney Level Lupus Nephritis Classification using Uncertainty Guided Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks
Beyond the Attention: Distinguish the Discriminative and Confusable Features For Fine-grained Image Classification
Orthrus: A Bimodal Learning Architecture for Malware Classification
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.