Fairness in Credit Scoring: Assessment, Implementation and Profit Implications
원문 초록
The rise of algorithmic decision-making has spawned much research on fair machine learning (ML). Financial institutions use ML for building risk scorecards that support a range of credit-related decisions. Yet, the literature on fair ML in credit scoring is scarce. The paper makes three contributions. First, we revisit statistical fairness criteria and examine their adequacy for credit scoring. Second, we catalog algorithmic options for incorporating fairness goals in the ML model development pipeline. Last, we empirically compare different fairness processors in a profit-oriented credit scoring context using real-world data. The empirical results substantiate the evaluation of fairness measures, identify suitable options to implement fair credit scoring, and clarify the profit-fairness trade-off in lending decisions. We find that multiple fairness criteria can be approximately satisfied at once and recommend separation as a proper criterion for measuring the fairness of a scorecard. We also find fair in-processors to deliver a good balance between profit and fairness and show that algorithmic discrimination can be reduced to a reasonable level at a relatively low cost. The codes corresponding to the paper are available on GitHub.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models
Improving Fairness of Large Language Models in Multi-document Summarization
Artificial Delegates Resolve Fairness Issues in Perpetual Voting with Partial Turnout
Fair for a few: Improving Fairness in Doubly Imbalanced Datasets
One Size Fits None: Rethinking Fairness in Medical AI
Towards Responsible AI: Advances in Safety, Fairness, and Accountability of Autonomous Systems
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.