Have We Learned to Explain?: How Interpretability Methods Can Learn to Encode Predictions in their Interpretations
원문 초록
While the need for interpretable machine learning has been established, many common approaches are slow, lack fidelity, or hard to evaluate. Amortized explanation methods reduce the cost of providing interpretations by learning a global selector model that returns feature importances for a single instance of data. The selector model is trained to optimize the fidelity of the interpretations, as evaluated by a predictor model for the target. Popular methods learn the selector and predictor model in concert, which we show allows predictions to be encoded within interpretations. We introduce EVAL-X as a method to quantitatively evaluate interpretations and REAL-X as an amortized explanation method, which learn a predictor model that approximates the true data generating distribution given any subset of the input. We show EVAL-X can detect when predictions are encoded in interpretations and show the advantages of REAL-X through quantitative and radiologist evaluation.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Leveraging Predictive Equivalence in Decision Trees
midr: Learning from Black-Box Models by Maximum Interpretation Decomposition
Manifold Learning with Normalizing Flows: Towards Regularity, Expressivity and Iso-Riemannian Geometry
NFISiS: New Perspectives on Fuzzy Inference Systems for Renewable Energy Forecasting
Neurosymbolic Association Rule Mining from Tabular Data
A Statistical Evaluation of Indoor LoRaWAN Environment-Aware Propagation for 6G: MLR, ANOVA, and Residual Distribution Analysis
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.